CRAN Package Check Results for Package noncompliance

Last updated on 2020-08-07 01:49:53 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.2.2 20.87 52.59 73.46 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.2.2 17.13 37.92 55.05 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.2.2 99.91 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.2.2 88.59 NOTE
r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 58.00 107.00 165.00 OK
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 17.76 50.40 68.16 OK
r-patched-solaris-x86 0.2.2 118.60 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 17.92 50.33 68.25 OK
r-release-macos-x86_64 0.2.2 OK
r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 59.00 135.00 194.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 0.2.2 OK
r-oldrel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 43.00 100.00 143.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 0.2.2
Check: compiled code
Result: NOTE
    File ‘noncompliance/libs/noncompliance.so’:
     Found no calls to: ‘R_registerRoutines’, ‘R_useDynamicSymbols’
    
    It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol
    search.
    
    See ‘Writing portable packages’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc